Despite Global Financial crisis, Emerging Countries are Confident

by M. Ulric Killion 

World Bank Building, Washington, D.C.; Photo/Wikimedia Commons (Public Domain). 

According to the World Bank, February 24, 2009—”Senior economic and central bank officials from emerging market countries who participated in a February 12th World Bank video conference on the global economic crisis said that despite falling trade volume and slowing GDP growth, their financial systems and international reserves remain strong, in contrast to the crises of the late 1990s.”

This includes the economy-performance expectations of Asian and Latin American economies, including China. As announced by the World Bank, “While officials from China, India and Brazil confirmed a recovery in capital inflows and international currency reserves in recent months, they have also taken measures to stimulate their economies, while also delivering social programs to cushion the impact of job losses. For example, Yang Jinlin, of China’s Asia-Pacific Finance and Development Center, noted that China’s GDP growth dropped from 10 to 6.8 percent in the fourth quarter of 2008, largely due to a 10-percent drop in exports during the same period. This has wiped out jobs for 23 million migrant workers in China, he said. It has prompted the Chinese government to reduce interest rates five times, and to launch a stimulus package worth four trillion yuan over the next two years. These measures are aimed at preventing a hard landing for the Chinese economy, he said. He acknowledged that the shift from an export-driven to a domestic-demand-driven economic model will take a long time.”

During the discussions of policymakers and analysts, at the third in a series of Global Dialogues as a Response to the Global Economic Crisis organized by the World Bank Institute (WBI), which delivers knowledge and learning services to developing countries, Guillermo Calvo (Columbia University) observed “that while the U.S. is suffering a drop in aggregate demand combined with a credit crunch, most emerging markets are faring better.”

References: 

World Bank- News & Broadcast: Emerging Countries’ Officials Show Confidence Despite Growth Slowdown, February 24, 2009.

世界银行, 新闻动态, 尽管增长放缓，新兴国家的官员仍表现出信心, 2009年2月24日.

Copyright © Protected - All Rights Reserved M. Ulric Killion, 2009.

Relation of Game Theory to Economic History and Marginalism

February 24

Relation of Game Theory to Economic History and Marginalism

Munich Personal RePEc Archive

Relation of Game Theory to Economic History and Marginalism

Killion, M. Ulric (2009): Relation of Game Theory to Economic History and Marginalism. Unpublished.

This is the latest version of this eprint.

Full text available as:

Preview

PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
202Kb

Abstract

The Article presents a brief survey of economic history, by emphasizing the earlier history of neo-classical economic theory and the economic theory of marginal utility. The Articles does so, by exploring the relation of game theory or the strategic game to developments in the field or science of economics, especially developments in economic thought occurring during the earlier marginal revolution or the economic history of marginalism. By doing so, the Article intends to show, though most attribute the new science of modern game theory to the field of mathematics, that the influence of corresponding or correlating developments in the field, science or discipline of economics was equally influential in the birth of game theory or the strategic game. 
 

Item Type:
MPRA Paper

Language:
English

Keywords:
Economic history, neo-classical theory, marginalism, game theory 

Subjects:
B - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925
A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory

ID Code:
13436

Deposited By:
M. Ulric Killion

Deposited On:
17. Feb 2009 09:00

Last Modified:
17. Feb 2009 09:00 

References: 

Aumann, R. J. and M. Maschler. (1985). Game Theoretic Analysis of a Bankruptcy Problem from the Talmud, Journal of Economic Theory 36, 195-213.

Benjamin, Arthur T. and A.J. Goldman. 2002. “Analysis of N-Card le Her,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 114, no. 3, September Issue.

Bernoulli, Daniel. 1896. Die Grundlage der modernen Wertlehre: Daniel Bernoulli, Versuch einer neuen Theorie der Wertbestimmung von Glucksfallen (Specimen Theoriae novae de Mensura Sortis)/aus dem Lateinischen ubersetzt und mit Erlauterungen versehen), Duncker & Humblot.

_____. 1896. Versuch einer neuen Theorie zur Bestimmung von Glücksfällen, Pringsheim, trans., Leipzib, 27 ff.

_____. 1954. Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk by Daniel Bernoulli, Lousie Sommer, trans. of Bernoulli’s Commentaries of the Imperial Academy of Science of Saint Petersburg (Bernoulli, 1738), Econometrica 22 (1): 22–36, January Issue; http://www.math.fau.edu/richman/Ideas/daniel.htm.

_____. 1982. Die Werke von Daniel Bernoulli: Band 2: Analysis, Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung (Gesammelten Werke der Mathematiker Und Physiker der Familie), D. Speiser, L.P. Bouchaert & B.L. van der Waerden, eds., Birkhäuser Basel.

Bernoulli, Nicolas. 1999. Correspondence of Nicolas Bernoulli to Montmort, Basel, Sept. 9, 1713, Essay d'Analysis, 402, Richard J. Pulskamp.

Bernstein, Michael A. 2004. Professionalizing Economics: The ‘Marginalist Revolution’ in Historical Context, (unpublished, UC Riverside, Dept. of Economics, Political Economy & Development, Spring Seminars.

Cooter, Robert. 1995. Law and Unified Social Theory, Journal of Law & Society, Vol. 22, No. 1, March Issue, 50, 52.

Cournot, Augustin. 1838. Recherché sur les Principes Mathematiques de la Theorie des Richesses, Hachette, 1838. 

Cramer, Gabriel. 1738. Letter of 21 May 1738 to Nicolaus Bernoulli; http://www.pdfdownload.org/pdf.

Crawford, V. P. 1990. Equilibrium without Independence, Journal of Economic Theory Vol. 50,127-154.

Crespi, Gregory Scott. 1998. Exploring the Complicationist Gambit: An Austrian Approach to the Economic
Analysis of Law, Vol. 73, No. 2, Notre Dame Law Review, January Issue, 320-21.

Dresher, M. 1951. “Games of Strategy”, Math. Magazine, 25, 93–99.

Fisher, R.A. 1934. “Randomisation and an Old Enigma of Card Play”, Math. Gazette, 18, 294–297.

Ghoneim, Hebatallah and Yasmine Reda. 2008. The US-China Trade Conflict: A Game Theoretical Analysis, Working Paper No. 15, October Issue, German University in Cairo.

Gossen, Hermann Heinrich. 1967. Entwicklung der Gesetze des menschlichen Verkehrs und der daraus fließenden Regeln für menschliches Handeln (1954), Liberac.

Harsanyi, J. C. 1973). Games with Randomly Distured Payoffs: A New Rationale for Mixed Strategy Equilibrium Points, International Journal of Game Theory Vol. 2, 1-23.

Heath, Sir Thomas L. 1963. A Manual of Greek Mathematics 1, Dover.

Houwe, Ludwig Van Den. 1998. Evolution and the Production of Rules—Some Preliminary Remarks, European Journal of Law and Economics 5, p. 88.

Howey, R.S. 1973. “The Origins of Marginalism”, in The Marginal Revolution in Economics: Interpretation and Evaluation, R.D. Collison Black, A.W.Coats, & Craufurd D.W. Goodwin, eds., Duke, 15-36.

Hülsmann, Jörg Guido. 2007. Mises: Last Knight of Liberalism, Ludwig von Mises Institute, 101-140.

Jevons, William Stanley. 1866. Brief Account of A General Mathematical Theory of Political Economy, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, London, XXIX, June, 282-87, (Section F of the British Association.

_____. 1891. The Theory of Political Economy (1871), Ibis.

Kauder, Emil. 1953. The Retarded Acceptance of the Marginal Utility Theory, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 67, No. 4, November Issue, 564-575.

Machina, Mark J. 1990. Expected utility hypothesis, In Utility and Probabililty, J. Eatwell, M. Milgate & P. Newman, eds., Norton, 89.

Klein, Peter G. 2007. Menger the empiricist, Organizations & Markets, (unpublished, September 14) http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/09/14/menger-the-empiricist/.

Kuhn, H. W. (1968). “Preface to Waldegrave's Comments: Excerpt from Montmort's Letter to Nicholas Bernoulli”, in Precursors in Mathematical Economics: An Anthology (Series of Reprints of Scarce Works on Political Economy, 19), W. J. Baumol and S. M. Goldfeld, eds., 3-9, London School of Economics and Political Science.

Meinong, Alexius. 1896. Über die Bedeutung des Weberschen Gesetzes: Beiträge zur Psychologie des Vergleichens und Messens, (Chap. I, § 3), [About the importance of Weber’s law, contributions to the psychology of comparison and measurement].

Menger, Carl. 1909. Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre (Vienna, 1871), 88 ff. Böhm-Bawerk, Kapital und Kapitalzins, Innsbruck, Pt. II, 237 ff.

_____. 1976. Principles of Economics, (J. Dingwall & B. F. Hoselitz, trans., New York, 97.

_____. 2007. Principles of Economics (1871), Ludwig von Mises Institute, [Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre].

Menger, Karl. 1934. Das Unsicherheitsmoment in der Wertlehre, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 5 (4): 459–485 (Aug.), [The Role of Uncertainty in Economics, Journal of Economics, vol. 5, no. 4, 459-485 (Aug.)].

Mises, Ludwig von. 1949. Human Action (1940), 119-27.

_____. 1985. Liberalism in the Classical Tradition, (German ed., 1927), Ralph Raico, trans., Foundation for Economic Education.

Morrison, Clarence C. 1998. Cournot, Bertrand, and Modern Game Theory, Atlantic Economic Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2, June Issue, 172-174.

Nash, Jr., John F. 1950a. Equilibrium Points in N-person Games, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 36, 48-49.

_____. 1950b. The Bargaining Problem, Econometrica, Vol. 18, 155-162.

_____. 1953. Two-person Cooperative Games, Econometrica, Vol. 21, 128-140.

Neumann, John and Oskar Morgenstern. 1928. Zur Theorie der Gesellschaftsspiele, Mathematische Annalen, 100, 295–300.

_____. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton.

Ohlin, Bertil. 1926. Obituary: Knut Wicksell (1851-1926), The Economic Journal, Vol. 36, No. 143, September Issue, 503-512.

Pareto, Vilfredo. 1971. Manual of Political Economy (1927), translated by Ann S. Schwier, New York: A. M. Kelly, [Manuel d'économie politique. 2. éd., 1927].

Ramsey, Frank. 1931. Truth and probability (1926), In The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, R. Braithwaithe, ed., Harcourt, Brace.

Ringer, Fritz K. 1969. The Decline of the German Mandarins: The German Academic Community, 1890-1933, Harvard University Press.

_____. 1979. The German Academic Community 409-29, in The Organization of Knowledge in Modern America, 1860-1920, A. Oleson and J. Voss, eds., Johns Hopkins University Press, 423.

Rothbard, Murray. 1962. Man, Economy and State 1-5, Ludwig von Mises Institute.

_____. 1970. Man, Economy and State, Ludwig von Mises Institute. . Samuelson, Paul A. 1974.

Complementarity: An Essay on The 40th Anniversary of the Hicks-Allen Revolution in Demand Theory, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 12, No. 4, Dec. Issue, 1255-1289.

Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict, Harvard University Press.

Seen, Peter. 2000. Mathematics and the social sciences at the time of the modern beginnings of the social sciences, Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 27, No. 3/4, 271 – 292.

Shachat, Jason M. 2002. Mixed Strategy Play and the Minimax Hypothesis, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 104, Issue 1, May, 189-226.

Sima, Josef. 2004. Praxeology as Law & Economics, Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2, Spring Issue, 73-89.

Todhunter, I. 1949. A History of the Mathematical Theory of Probability, Chelsea, New York, Reprint.

Theocharis, Reghinos D. 1990. A Note on the Lag in the Recognition of Cournot’s Contribution to Economic Analysis, The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'Economique, Vol. 23, No. 4, November Issue, 923-933.

Walra, Léon. 1976. Éléments d'économie politique pure, ou théorie de la richesse sociale (1874), Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.

Weber, Max Weber. 1922. Collected Essays on Sociology of Religion [Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre].

_____. 1922. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tübingen, 149, 372.

_____. 1967. Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society, Max Rheinstein and Edward A. Shils, editors, Simon & Schuster.

_____. 2006. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (1922), Voltmedia, Paderborn.

Weinberger, Otto. 1926. Die Grenznutzenschule, Halberstadt, (history of marginal utility from Aristotle to Gossen).

Zafirovski, Milan. 2001. Max Weber’s Analysis of Marginal Utility Theory and Psychology Revisited: Latent Propositions in Economic Sociology and the Sociology of Economics, History of Political Economy, Vol. 33, No. 3, Fall Issue, 437-458.

Available Versions of this Item

• Relation of game theory to economic history and marginalism. (deposited 13. Feb 2009 01:43)
  • Relation of Game Theory to Economic History and Marginalism. (deposited 13. Feb 2009 08:01)
    • Relation of Game Theory to Economic History and Marginalism. (deposited 17. Feb 2009 09:00) [Currently Displayed]

All papers reproduced by permission. Reproduction and distribution subject to the approval of the copyright owners.
Repository Staff Only: edit this item

MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by
the Munich University Library in Germany.